中华外科杂志
2026年 · 第64卷第05期
中华外科杂志
- 全部
- 述评
- 专家共识
- 专家论坛
- 外科论坛
- 论著
- 技术交流
Patients after valve replacement may need to treat the prosthetic valve again due to artificial valve failure, biological valve failure, artificial valve endocarditis, pannus or thrombosis resulting in artificial valve dysfunction, and prosthesis-patient mismatch (PPM). It has been reported that up to 1/3 of patients after prosthetic valve replacement require re-valve intervention[1]。 Although transcatheter valve replacement has matured over the past 20 years as a viable alternative to open valve replacement for biological valve failure and failure[2]。 However, when faced with prosthetic valve endocarditis, post-mechanical valve replacement, valve thrombosis or paravalvular leakage, re-open valve replacement is still the only option[3, 4]。 How to improve the prognosis of patients with multiple valve replacement after re-thoracotomy is a serious challenge for cardiac surgery clinicians. David et al.[5]Commando surgery was attempted to deal with this kind of problem. However, due to the high requirements of surgeons, complicated operation, high postoperative mortality and complication rate, it has not been widely carried out at home and abroad. At present, there are few related studies of Commando surgery applied to multi-valve replacement in rethoracotomy. This study retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of patients with multiple valve replacement after rethoracotomy using Commando surgery, and provided clinical reference.
本期目次

