中华外科杂志
2026年 · 第64卷第03期
中华外科杂志
- 全部
- 指南与规范
- 专家共识
- 专家论坛
- 论著
- 短篇论著
- 综述
Since 1996 Gagner[1]Since the completion of the first case of laparoscopic thyroid surgery, this procedure has developed rapidly, but the academic community has continuously questioned it. The core of the controversy is the extra trauma caused by laparoscopic thyroid surgery[2, 3, 4]。 The anatomical structure of the neck and the thoracic and abdominal cavity is different, and the operating space cannot be obtained by direct inflation, so the space can only be established outside the neck and then extended to the neck. This way of building a cavity outside the neck brings additional trauma to laparoscopic thyroid surgery. In the previous operation, the author's team observed that there was a very loose tissue between the lower end of the sternocleidomastoid muscle and the platysma muscle, and there was no obvious blood vessel in between, that is, the anterior space of the sternocleidomastoid muscle. In May 2022, we completed the first case of double-port subclavicular endoscopic thyroid surgery using this as the starting point of cavity construction and in situ cavity construction in the neck[5]。 After 3 years of continuous accumulation of clinical experience and technical improvement, the design idea and case data of this operation are now reported.
本期目次

