MedNexus
2022年 · 第102卷第41期
MedNexus
- 全部
- 述评
- 专家论坛
- 标准与规范
- 单侧双通道内镜
- 临床研究
- 综述
- 文献速览
In recent years, unilateral dual-channel endoscopic (UBE) spinal surgery has been gradually used to treat lumbar degenerative diseases and other spinal diseases. It is generally believed that UBE surgery has the advantages of wide visual field, flexible operation, less trauma, sufficient nerve decompression and faster postoperative recovery. Even for skilled spinal surgeons, there are still many difficulties and risks in the early stages of performing UBE surgery. Understanding the learning curve of UBE has some instructive implications for most physicians who want to carry out this technique.
Dissection of the posterior edge of the lumbar vertebral body often requires surgery. In the past, open surgery has completely decompressed, but there are shortcomings such as large trauma, heavy bleeding and spinal instability. Fusion surgery can solve the problem of spinal instability at the same time, it is easy to lead to adjacent segment degeneration and lumbar failure syndrome. Although the technique of percutaneous spinal endoscopy has been applied to the posterior edge dissection of the lumbar vertebral body with less trauma and fast recovery, satisfactory decompression within the spinal canal remains a great challenge for spinal surgeons. Unilateral dual-channel endoscopy (UBE) is a good choice for the treatment of posterior edge dissection of lumbar vertebral body. UBE uses two channels for operation, and the working instrument and endoscope do not interfere with each other. The operation flexibility is better, and the range and degree of decompression are more thorough. Previous studies have shown that UBE has a good clinical effect in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation and lumbar spinal stenosis. However, this method has not been reported in the treatment of posterior vertebral dissection.
本期目次

