MedNexus
2019年 · 第47卷第10期
MedNexus
- 全部
- 总编随笔
- 述评
- 指南与共识
- 介入治疗
- 临床研究
- 基础研究
- 综述
- 继续教育园地
At the beginning of the 21st century, with the in-depth understanding of the pathogenesis of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and the vigorous development of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), with key randomized controlled trials such as CURE and CREDO (randomized control trial, RCT) as the beginning, antiplatelet therapy for coronary heart disease seems to have been rushing towards the goal of "more, stronger and longer": it is not uncommon for high-risk patients to apply triple or even quadruple multi-target antithrombotic strategies; High loading/high maintenance clopidogrel and routine application of platelet membrane glycoprotein Ⅱb/Ⅲa receptor antagonists further reduced the risk of perioperative thrombotic events in PCI; Subsequently, out of concern about the delayed thrombosis after the first-generation drug-eluting stent (DES) surgery, ultra-long-duration dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for more than 12 months became a research hotspot; Further afterwards, new P2Y such as prasugrel and ticagrelor12The emergence of inhibitors makes us excited about having a more powerful weapon to fight thrombotic events. However, in recent years, things seem to have turned around. After a series of events such as the fall of platelet membrane glycoprotein Ⅱb/Ⅲa receptor antagonist, the writing of short-course DAPT into international guidelines, and the questioning of the "aspirin belief" once regarded as the standard, reduced-order treatment has inadvertently become a new hotspot in the research field of antiplatelet therapy for coronary heart disease.
本期目次

