2024年 · 第02卷第02期

Background: Chemotherapy remains the standard-of-care for many patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but acquired resistance presents challenges. The aim of this open-label, multicenter phase 2 clinical trial was to determine the efficacy and safety of utidelone, a novel genetically engineered epothilone analog and microtubule-stabilizing agent, as a third- or later-line treatment for locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC. Methods: Patients who had failed standard second-line treatment (including platinum-containing chemotherapy or targeted therapy) received utidelone (40 mg/m2 via intravenous injection daily, day 1-5) every 21 days. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints were the duration of response (DoR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. Results: From March 12, 2019 to January 18, 2021, 26 pretreated patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC (100% of patients had received prior platinum and 65.4% patients had received prior taxane treatment) were enrolled (80.8% of patients had adenocarcinoma). At baseline, nine (34.6%) patients had received second-line treatment, 10 (38.5%) patients had received third-line treatment, and seven (26.9%) patients had received fourth- or later-line treatment. By the data cut-off date of August 10, 2021, the median follow-up was 7.49 months (range, 1.4-26.7 months). The ORR was 15.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.4%-34.9%) in the intention-to-treat (ITT) cohort (N = 26) and 19.0% (95% CI, 5.4%-41.9%) in the per-protocol (PP) cohort (N = 21). The disease control rate was 69.2% (95% CI, 48.2%-85.7%) and 81.0% (95% CI, 58.1%-94.6%) in the ITT and PP cohorts, respectively. The median DoR was 4.1 months (95% CI, 3.1-5.1 months) in the ITT cohort. The median PFS was 4.37 months (95% CI, 2.50-5.29 months) in the ITT cohort and 4.37 months (95% CI, 2.50-9.76 months) in the PP cohort. The median OS was not reached, and the 12-month OS rate was 69% (95% CI, 45.1%-84.1%). Grade 3/4 treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 38.5% of patients, and the most common was peripheral neuropathy (23.1%, all Grade 3), which was manageable with dose modifications. Conclusions: In this clinical trial, utidelone showed promising efficacy and had a manageable safety profile. Further clinical studies are warranted to confirm its role in NSCLC treatment. Trial registration: No.NCT03693547; https://classic.clinicaltrials.gov.

Background: Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a heterogeneous hematopoietic malignancy whose prognosis is associated with several biomarkers. Decitabine, a deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) methyltransferase (DNMT) inhibitor, combined with cytarabine, aclarubicin hydrochloride, and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (DCAG), has been used in patients newly diagnosed with AML. This regimen has been especially used in older and fragile patients who are immunocompromised or have co-morbidities, as well as those with specific gene mutations. However, the integration of molecular risk stratification and treatment guidance for the DCAG regimen has not been well defined. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the genetic mutations associated with AML and establish appropriate treatment strategies for patients newly diagnosed with AML. Methods: This study analyzed the clinical data and genetic mutations based on next-generation sequencing (NGS) in 124 newly diagnosed patients with AML who received the DCAG regimen at the People's Liberation Army (PLA) General Hospital from January 2008 to August 2020. Factors associated with the cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) and leukemia-free survival (LFS) in patients newly diagnosed with AML were analyzed. Results: The most adverse prognosis of DCAG-treated patients was observed in those with FLT3-ITD, KIT, PTPN11, GATA2, or IDH1 mutations during univariable analysis, whereas PTPN11 mutation was solely significant in multivariable analysis, with an increased likelihood of CIR (P = 0.001) and reduced LFS duration (P = 0.077). Hyperleukocytosis was maintained as an independent risk factor for increased CIR risk (P = 0.044) and decreased LFS duration (P = 0.042) in multivariable analysis. In this study, we validated the risk classification of patients with AML receiving an epigenetic modifier-based induction regimen across a broad age range. Conclusion: NGS demonstrated a dismal overall outcome in patients with the rare PTPN11 mutations, indicating the need for new therapies that target this high-risk subtype of AML. These results offer a potential molecular stratification and treatment guidance for patients with AML.

Background: Colon cancer is one of the most prevalent digestive cancers worldwide. Results of epidemiological, experimental, and clinical studies suggest that aspirin inhibits the development of colon cancer. This study aimed to systematically elucidate the molecular mechanisms by which aspirin prevents colon carcinogenesis. Methods: We determined the global protein expression profiles of colorectal cancer and aspirin-treated cells using quantitative proteomic analysis. We analyzed the proteomic results using bioinformatics (including differential proteins, protein annotation, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes [KEGG] pathways, and protein-protein interaction [PPI] network). The viability of the colon cancer cell line and HT29 cells treated with aspirin was determined using the cell counting kit-8 assay. The differentially expressed proteins, such as p53 and cyclin-dependent kinase 1 (CDK1), were quantified using real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and Western blotting. We measured cell cycle distribution and apoptosis in HT29 cells exposed to aspirin using fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS). Results: We found that 552 proteins were significantly dysregulated, of which 208 and 334 were upregulated and downregulated, respectively, in colon cancer cells exposed to 10 mmol/L of aspirin (95% confidence interval [CI]:-1.269 to -0.106, P < 0.05). Further gene enrichment analysis revealed that cell cycle-related proteins, such as p53 and CDK1, were significantly differentially expressed. Proteomic analysis showed that after 24 h of aspirin exposure, the level of p53 increased by 2.52-fold and CDK1 was downregulated to half that of the controls in HT29 cells (95% CI: -0.619 to -0.364, P < 0.05). Real-time PCR and Western blotting results showed that p53 was upregulated (95%CI: -3.088 to -1.912, P < 0.001) and CDK1 was significantly downregulated after aspirin exposure in colon cancer cells (95% CI: 0.576 to 1.045, P < 0.05). We observed that aspirin promoted G1/S cell cycle arrest in HT29 cells. We confirmed that aspirin induces apoptosis in human HT29 colon cancer cells in a concentration-dependent manner. Conclusions: These results indicate that aspirin induces G1 arrest and apoptosis in colorectal cancer cells via the p53-CDK1 pathway. Aspirin may be a promising drug candidate for colon cancer prevention.

Background: Metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC) is an aggressive histological subtype with poor prognosis. Several first-line treatments are currently available for mTNBC. This study conducted a network meta-analysis to compare these first-line regimens and to determine the regimen with the best efficacy. Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Bases, and minutes of major conferences was performed. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and objective response rate (ORR) were analyzed via network meta-analysis using the R software (R Core Team, Vienna, Austria). The efficacy of the treatment regimens was compared using hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals. Results: A total of 29 randomized controlled trials involving 4607 patients were analyzed. The ranking was based on the surface under the cumulative ranking curve. Network meta-analysis results showed that cisplatin combined with nab-paclitaxel or paclitaxel was superior to docetaxel plus capecitabine in terms of PFS and ORR. For programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) and breast cancer susceptibility gene (BRCA) mutation-positive tumors, atezolizumab/pembrolizumab combined with nab-paclitaxel and talazoparib was superior to docetaxel plus capecitabine. No significant difference was observed among the treatments in OS. Neutropenia, diarrhea, and fatigue were common serious adverse events. Conclusion: Cisplatin combined with nab-paclitaxel or paclitaxel is the preferred first-line treatment for mTNBC. For PD-L1 and BRCA mutation-positive tumors, atezolizumab/pembrolizumab combined with nab-paclitaxel and talazoparib is an effective treatment option. Neutropenia, diarrhea, and fatigue are frequently occurring serious adverse events.

Background: Programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) and programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors have become integral elements within the current landscape of breast cancer treatment modalities; however, they are associated with interstitial lung disease (ILD), which is rare but potentially fatal. Notably, only a few studies have compared the difference in ILD incidence between PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the discrepancies regarding ILD risk between the two immune checkpoint inhibitors. We also reported three cases of ILD after PD-1 inhibitor treatment. Methods: We comprehensively searched PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library to identify clinical trials that investigated PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor treatment for patients with breast cancer. Pooled overall estimates of incidence and risk ratio (RR) were calculated with a 95% confidence interval (CI), and a mirror group analysis was performed using eligible studies. Results: This meta-analysis included 29 studies with 4639 patients who received PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor treatment. A higher ILD incidence was observed among 2508 patients treated with PD-1 inhibitors than among 2131 patients treated with PD-L1 inhibitors (0.05 vs. 0.02). The mirror group analysis further revealed a higher ILD event risk in patients treated with PD-1 inhibitors than in those treated with PD-L1 inhibitors (RR = 2.34, 95% CI, 1.13-4.82, P = 0.02). Conclusion: Our findings suggest a greater risk of ILD with PD-1 inhibitors than with PD-L1 inhibitors. These findings are instrumental for clinicians in treatment deliberations, and the adoption of more structured diagnostic approaches and management protocols is necessary to mitigate the risk of ILD.

The significance of the heme-metabolizing enzyme heme oxygenase-1 (HMOX1) in the pathogenesis of colorectal cancer (CRC) has not been fully explored. HMOX1 cytoprotection is imperative to limit oxidative stress. However, its roles in preventing carcinogenesis in response to high levels of heme are not thoroughly understood. This study reviews various mechanisms associated with the paradoxical role of HMOX1, which is advantageous for tumor growth, refractoriness, and survival of cancer cells amid oxidative stress in heme-induced CRC. The alternate role of HMOX1 promotes cell proliferation and metastasis through immune modulation and angiogenesis. Inhibiting HMOX1 has been found to reverse tumor promotion. Thus, HMOX1 acts as a conditional tumor promoter in CRC pathogenesis.

Bladder cancer encapsulates a wide spectrum of disease severities, with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) representing an entirely different entity from muscle-invasive disease. Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) is one of the most successful intravesical treatment methods for patients diagnosed. However, a considerable proportion of patients fail to respond to BCG treatment. Given the propensity for recurrence in patients with high-risk bladder cancer, these patients present with surgical dilemmas. There is currently no gold standard for salvage treatment post-BCG failure or unified definition as to what that means. In this review, we discuss the mechanisms of action and pathophysiology of BCG, potential theories behind BCG failure, and the scope of novel treatments for this surgical conundrum.